Ending with a fizzle ?
December 18, 2009
Well, that was disappointing to say the least. Obama the damp squib.
Obama and Jintao are digging in, effectively setting the stage for a trans-Pacific economic war. Nothing new from the States, very little from China. In fact the only statesman coming out of this looking at all good right now is Lula who as good as said ‘Sod the lot of you. We’ll do it on our own’ by committing himself and his country unilaterally to cut emissions and increase energy efficiency.
There was an strange counterpoint in the webcasts earlier with the delegation of Republican senators holding a press conference at the same time as Bolivia & Venezeula. Opposite ends of the spectrum in so many way, but speaking in rooms next to each other.
The Republicans said bluntly ‘We don’t believe the science’. The South American compadres said bluntly ‘We don’t believe the Americans’. The problem is that the Republicans will prevent the US taking any concrete action that doesn’t materially benefit the US economy. All of the US delegation’s rhetoric so far has been 100% focussed on addressing the USA, its population and current economic problems. Nothing of substance has been put on the table to address anyone else’s concerns, and no signals to indicate that possibility either.
One of the scariest things was one of the Republican senators saying that they would agree to nothing remotely like a deal on emissions without a comprehensive agreement on Intellectual Property (IP) involved with technology transfer. That’s not something that is going to happen overnight. Or even in a year. That’s a 5-year kind of a job and the sort of thing that the WTO does, not the UN.
This leaves everyone in a very difficult situation. Europe has committed to substantial and binding changes to the energy system, but only makes up something like 25% of total emissions. China has energy efficiency as a core economic aim and has for several years (it is part of their 5-year plans), so no-one else wants to fund their growth because additionality (doing stuff over and above that already planned) is not guaranteed without transparency. SE Asia has to compete directly with China or be swamped by its growth. India wants (justifiably) to drag itself out of poverty. Everyone seems to have tied their own national hands right now.
The little guys (politically) are sitting on the side lines hanging their heads and searching their address books for friends and family who live on higher ground.
Its time for the US EPA to play the joker and do something drastic and politically rash, or for China to accept that it has dodgy accounting procedures and allow someone else to keep the books. Neither look likely.
The people with most at stake right now, apart from the small island states and LDCs who get screwed every which way, are the UN and EU. The UN’s credibility as a power-broker is taking a serious hit. The EU’s commitment to change and aim means it (we) take an economic hit, compared with the US, China, etc.
As I said at the beginning of the post, this is the recipe for the protectionism and economic separatism that I have previously warned against with respect to energy. The American delegations, whether it be the veterans groups or the official delegations, keep using the phrase ‘threat multiplier’ with respect to climate change. I agree, but the quickest route to that multiplication is trade war, a threat that only politicians are responsible for.
Update on the post press conference: The EU Commission Pres Barroso was fuming and pointed at ‘partner countries’ that consistently worked against ambitious emissions targets. It sounded like the 30% cut was put on the table and swept off by all other developed nations and major developing nations, but that interpretation should become clearer when tempers have cooled. The Australian PM Rudd appears to be reading a different text and be right up the US’s arse. The Ozzies won’t say what they will do until everyone else has deilvered.
I’m waiting to see if the thing gets thrown away by the Plenary.
Updated update; The COP is heavy going at 3am but the Central/S American compadres have just read something into the record and the tired looking Danish PM is taking advice on whether the chair can accept the statement. It sounded like it committed the COP to continuous siting until all issues were resolved in full session rather than informal sub-groups behind closed doors. Smart move if it can be done. It means the meeting cannot be closed and the ‘accord’ does not come into effect.
20 mins on and discussions on the high table continue. Have the Bolivarian brotherhood pulled a fast one ?
An hour or so later (04:05):
Yep. They’ve been to the lawyers and are trying to force the COP to suspend rather than close, so consigning the accord to be an appendix or misc doc.
Back into a huddle the top table goes after Nicaragua makes it clear that this is the groups aim.
Back under discussion and the Sudanese Ambassador has likened the document to the Holocaust. Not surprisingly this hasn’t gone down well and there are calls for the remark to be retracted. The Bolivarian brotherhood have blocked the document, but most others want it adopted as some mark of tangible progress. One delegation has suggested that they attach an opt out on the bottom of the doc instead of it being abandonded.
Nearly there. Delegates are asking the chair to rearrange flights for them.
And Venezuela brings it back to process.
The Solomons delegation walks as its now late for its flight.
Other delegates start to walk while V is still talking.
Sudan chips back in with waffle. They are just padding now.
That’s it ‘The Accord’ has been shot down unless Ed can do something in the next 5 mins
Apparently if the Accord is uptaken by the COP money can start to flow straight away. If it is relegated to a ‘misc’ document no money can or will flow
Ed’s last minute adjournment goes on. Almost an hour now. I can see a gathering near Nicaragua’s desk. But there’s no sound.
Whatever Ed’s said its got them talking. There are delegates on phones and some really earnest groups. There is also a little stage front flirting going on.
Looks like they’ve woken up Ban Ki Moon. He seems to be on the stage now.
Ed is striding back and forth between two delegations, both off camera, with a couple of PAs in tow. Earlier one of the Bolivarian brotherhood’s complaints was exclusion from the group of heads of state that drafted the accord. I wonder if Ed’s just democratised that process to include Venez, Boli, Cuba, Nicaragua & Sudan
Looks like things are drawing to a conclusion. Delegates are watching the stage expectantly.
Spoke too soon. The officials look like they have something to do. They are reading something.
Just seen Yvo de Boer
Looks like they are discussing procedure of how to swap to a new text ! Yes, thats what it looks like.
Yes. Ed got the accord through. The Maldives are extatic. Its still a weak piece of paper but at least the money can flow right now.
Spoke too soon. Sudan, Egypt and China have raised concerns and asked for clarifications, but they are discussing words not documents.
And so it goes on, and on and on. Enough already !

December 25, 2009 at 11:52
Regarding the EU’s 30% cut by 2050: from what I read it was because China didn’t want it. By 2050 they would be a developed country (or near as) and so effectively would have to accept the same cut, which they don’t want. (Although you probably already read about that or have a better thought)
You weren’t at Copenhagen were you?
(Merry Christmas)
December 25, 2009 at 12:59
Hi Paul,
Merry Christmas to you too. No I wasn’t in Copenhagen. I watched all the relevant webcasts and watched the whole final session (all 15+hrs of it) in real-time. This post started out as a comment on the process but as time went on, and on and on, it became obvious that there were games afoot so I carried on updating the post as new twists and turns happened.
What was apparent even in that final session was the communist bloc (Venezeula, Nicaragua, Cuba, Sudan & Bolivia) were throwing in spanner after spanner. Sudan especially were trying to draw out the process ad infinitum with filibustering waffle and the occasional crass remark. All four are heavily subsidised by China or supply the Chinese with natural resources, so it was a fairly heavily signaled alliance there.
Ed Miliband was really very impressive in that final session and I agree with this piece on that. He was banging on tables and fighting a rear-guard action against throwing the accord completely. Without him the Danish PM was a gavel tap away from there being no onward process at all, he had given up. The American delegation didn’t know what was going on. They looked out of their depth, even compared with relatively small delegations. The Indian delegation played a smart game, really intelligent and not overtly aggressive in any way.
The Chinese mainly stood back until The Accord looked like it would be taken up (after what should be known as ‘Ed’s Adjournment’), then they came in and started to try and run interference assisted by Nicaragua, Sudan and Venezuela. The tone had changed though, from not accepting anything to agreeing the exact wording and legal status of the accord. All the previous objections had been on the basis that the accord was not formulated within the COP/MOP process. This was clearly crap since there is no way that conferences like this actually negotiate things in Plenary, and once Ed had gone round the room and consulted the objecting delegations the Plenary actually started to negotiate on the text rather than simply objecting to process. I was a sight to see.
Anyway Miliband proved himself an able statesman and negotiator. Forget those photos with Merkel, Brown, Sarkosy and Obama. The real deal was in the Plenary at 4am.