What a difference a year makes !

Last year was full of hope. Openness and interdisciplinarity was part of the deal. Media exposure was integral to the design of the event.
This year the doors closed. Chatham House rules were imposed (and this report is composed under those restrictions). No media were there to report (though some did attend).

So what did we discuss at this exclusive event ?

Well. It became apparent that attendees saw the exclusivity as part of a wider trend (though they didn’t apparently see themselves as contributary to that trend). The phrase ‘decisions made in smoke filled rooms’ was one that was heard in more than one session. Speakers seemed less open to suggestions and there was a definite sense of ranks closing.

Partly this was put down to the relative success of the climate skeptic movement and the failure of COP15, but also to the new government’s policy set and approach so far. However, as a newcomer to this ‘scene’ I can’t help feeling this is the way that the regulars prefer it.

Fuel poverty seems to be taking a back seat with some kind of diluted concept of equitable apportionment of cost taking over. A greater focus on real politique and economics rather than innovation was evident. Argument rather than advance you could say. Calls for quick action, some action, any action seemed like a call to spend money rather than a call to change systemic conditions. Gone was the rhetoric of radical progress. In came the mumbled apologies of compromise.

Ending with a fizzle ?

December 18, 2009

Well, that was disappointing to say the least. Obama the damp squib.

Obama and Jintao are digging in, effectively setting the stage for a trans-Pacific economic war. Nothing new from the States, very little from China. In fact the only statesman coming out of this looking at all good right now is Lula who as good as said ‘Sod the lot of you. We’ll do it on our own’ by committing himself and his country unilaterally to cut emissions and increase energy efficiency.

There was an strange counterpoint in the webcasts earlier with the delegation of Republican senators holding a press conference at the same time as Bolivia & Venezeula. Opposite ends of the spectrum in so many way, but speaking in rooms next to each other.
The Republicans said bluntly ‘We don’t believe the science’. The South American compadres said bluntly ‘We don’t believe the Americans’. The problem is that the Republicans will prevent the US taking any concrete action that doesn’t materially benefit the US economy. All of the US delegation’s rhetoric so far has been 100% focussed on addressing the USA, its population and current economic problems. Nothing of substance has been put on the table to address anyone else’s concerns, and no signals to indicate that possibility either.
One of the scariest things was one of the Republican senators saying that they would agree to nothing remotely like a deal on emissions without a comprehensive agreement on Intellectual Property (IP) involved with technology transfer. That’s not something that is going to happen overnight. Or even in a year. That’s a 5-year kind of a job and the sort of thing that the WTO does, not the UN.

This leaves everyone in a very difficult situation. Europe has committed to substantial and binding changes to the energy system, but only makes up something like 25% of total emissions. China has energy efficiency as a core economic aim and has for several years (it is part of their 5-year plans), so no-one else wants to fund their growth because additionality (doing stuff over and above that already planned) is not guaranteed without transparency. SE Asia has to compete directly with China or be swamped by its growth. India wants (justifiably) to drag itself out of poverty. Everyone seems to have tied their own national hands right now.
The little guys (politically) are sitting on the side lines hanging their heads and searching their address books for friends and family who live on higher ground.

Its time for the US EPA to play the joker and do something drastic and politically rash, or for China to accept that it has dodgy accounting procedures and allow someone else to keep the books. Neither look likely.

The people with most at stake right now, apart from the small island states and LDCs who get screwed every which way, are the UN and EU. The UN’s credibility as a power-broker is taking a serious hit. The EU’s commitment to change and aim means it (we) take an economic hit, compared with the US, China, etc.

As I said at the beginning of the post, this is the recipe for the protectionism and economic separatism that I have previously warned against with respect to energy. The American delegations, whether it be the veterans groups or the official delegations, keep using the phrase ‘threat multiplier’ with respect to climate change. I agree, but the quickest route to that multiplication is trade war, a threat that only politicians are responsible for.

Update on the post press conference: The EU Commission Pres Barroso was fuming and pointed at ‘partner countries’ that consistently worked against ambitious emissions targets. It sounded like the 30% cut was put on the table and swept off by all other developed nations and major developing nations, but that interpretation should become clearer when tempers have cooled. The Australian PM Rudd appears to be reading a different text and be right up the US’s arse. The Ozzies won’t say what they will do until everyone else has deilvered.
I’m waiting to see if the thing gets thrown away by the Plenary.

Updated update; The COP is heavy going at 3am but the Central/S American compadres have just read something into the record and the tired looking Danish PM is taking advice on whether the chair can accept the statement. It sounded like it committed the COP to continuous siting until all issues were resolved in full session rather than informal sub-groups behind closed doors. Smart move if it can be done. It means the meeting cannot be closed and the ‘accord’ does not come into effect.
20 mins on and discussions on the high table continue. Have the Bolivarian brotherhood pulled a fast one ?

An hour or so later (04:05):
Yep. They’ve been to the lawyers and are trying to force the COP to suspend rather than close, so consigning the accord to be an appendix or misc doc.
Back into a huddle the top table goes after Nicaragua makes it clear that this is the groups aim.

Back under discussion and the Sudanese Ambassador has likened the document to the Holocaust. Not surprisingly this hasn’t gone down well and there are calls for the remark to be retracted. The Bolivarian brotherhood have blocked the document, but most others want it adopted as some mark of tangible progress. One delegation has suggested that they attach an opt out on the bottom of the doc instead of it being abandonded.

Nearly there. Delegates are asking the chair to rearrange flights for them.
And Venezuela brings it back to process.
The Solomons delegation walks as its now late for its flight.
Other delegates start to walk while V is still talking.
Sudan chips back in with waffle. They are just padding now.

That’s it ‘The Accord’ has been shot down unless Ed can do something in the next 5 mins
Apparently if the Accord is uptaken by the COP money can start to flow straight away. If it is relegated to a ‘misc’ document no money can or will flow

Ed’s last minute adjournment goes on. Almost an hour now. I can see a gathering near Nicaragua’s desk. But there’s no sound.
Whatever Ed’s said its got them talking. There are delegates on phones and some really earnest groups. There is also a little stage front flirting going on.

Looks like they’ve woken up Ban Ki Moon. He seems to be on the stage now.

Ed is striding back and forth between two delegations, both off camera, with a couple of PAs in tow. Earlier one of the Bolivarian brotherhood’s complaints was exclusion from the group of heads of state that drafted the accord. I wonder if Ed’s just democratised that process to include Venez, Boli, Cuba, Nicaragua & Sudan

Looks like things are drawing to a conclusion. Delegates are watching the stage expectantly.
Spoke too soon. The officials look like they have something to do. They are reading something.
Just seen Yvo de Boer

Looks like they are discussing procedure of how to swap to a new text ! Yes, thats what it looks like.

Yes. Ed got the accord through. The Maldives are extatic. Its still a weak piece of paper but at least the money can flow right now.
Spoke too soon. Sudan, Egypt and China have raised concerns and asked for clarifications, but they are discussing words not documents.
And so it goes on, and on and on. Enough already !

One Hundred and One Nights

August 28, 2009

With just over three months to go until the Copenhagen session of the United Nations Convention on Climate Change and less than a year left in office Ed Miliband his folks at DECC are working overtime.

The latest consultation is on improving grid access. Now I don’t pretend to understand all the details of how the process works right now or how the Security and Quality of Supply Standard (GB SQSS) and BETTA interact, but given that less than four years after BG SQSS’s introduction its proposed that it be completely re-written I’d surmise that its not been an un-alloyed success.

The fact of the matter is that there are literally dozens of electricity generating projects waiting in a queue to be connected to the grid. DECC estimates that projects totaling around 60GW of capacity is waiting for a date that they, and their investors, can work to. That’s a lot of advanced projects sitting on the shelf, waiting for a market into which they can sell their product. Not all of them will get all the way to production, but still that is a very slow queue when, lets face it, we could do with the work and the UK’s grid could do with some action on replacing the big coal plants that have to be phased out under the EU’s Large Combustion Plant Directive.

On a lighter note with COP15 just around the corner the government appears to be starting to flap. Malcolm Wicks wants a tripling of nuclear power while Ed Miliband was again vilified by some in the UK over coal plans after a speech to the South African Centre for CCS , while £1 billion of loans are guarenteed for offshore wind and £10m of grants to its even offer shore floating cousin (I’ll say some more on offshore wind at a later date).

Its all starting to look a bit desperate. You can make your own mind up as to why, but I have to ask who are we trying to impress here ? Most commentators agree that there is little point trying to appeal to UK voters, except maybe on a ‘look what we achieved last time we were in government’ ticket in 2014/15. The US is busy trying to convince itself that we kill our grannies as a matter of health policy. The Russians hate us. The Chinese couldn’t give a damn. So is it the Commonwealth that we are playing to ? A wider alliance of minor nations that will buy our climate friendly products after we defend their honour at COP15 ? Who is it ?

The answer may come in 101 nights time.

Well, after months of planning it all went off well. All the speakers turned up. No-one got injured. The AV worked. The swine flu pandemic held off.

We had ITV WestCountry News base a feature around the conference and decent local news coverage. Here are some pictures.

It was an interesting couple of days. Its a long time since I’ve talked to people doing fundamental science and I was really treading water when things started to get technical, but I survived, which is nice.

Impressions are;
That these guys are sick of being asked when its going to be in the shops. They understand the time-dependency where climate is concerned, the political dependency where energy security is concerned and the social and developmental imperatives too. They know their own areas incredibly well and were not really calling for more investment in those areas. What they want is science undergraduates from the UK in order to sustain the full development cycles for these technologies. OK, that’s investment, but its not something that can be fixed short term by throwing cash at it.
Overseas undergrads and postgrads are good at keeping university research departments open from a financial point of view, but those guys & girls go back home after a few years taking their skills with them. This disrupts development and slows it down. International and inter-disciplinary working are really good, even essential, things to get a set of solutions to market, but the fundamental science needs long-term dedication as well.

Having said that, the time-table is as follows:
Fuel cells – domestic commercialisation in the next couple of years in the UK for fuel cell CHP running on natural gas – looking at it from the outside the market needs a policy kick-start, but apart from that its good to go. Industrial commercialisation appears more price dependent because of the engineering involved in coping with the stack heat, and is strictly niche at the moment. The focus is on bringing the stack operating temperature down.
Hydrogen fuel cell cars – 2015 roll-out date from a consortium of several manufacturers, but requires govt investment in infrastructure. Looks ambitious to me, even in Japan. 2020 looks more like it.
Synfuels from CO2, sunlight and water – 10-15 years to pre-commercial scale. Something about this one seems a bit ‘too good to be true’ to me. I’m sure that you can synthesize simple hydrocarbons from water and air, but I’m not sure that its a great idea in the full life-cycle. I think that we should probably aim higher. Early days though.
Fusion – sometime this century (probably)
Fission – the first 3rd gen is currently being built in Finland
Photovoltaics – 15-25 years to cost parity with current grid power based on silicon technologies – dye-sensitized organics or thin film could disrupt this curve. Dye sensitized cells are much closer to mass roll-out than second gen thin film. First gen thin film (CIGS) are available now in small volumes.
Supercaps – already commercialised and in 1 million Prius’s
Hydrogen storage – 10+ years at best

So, really and truly sustainable solar PV, hydrogen and synfuels are 10+ years away, at least, and investment will not help in the short term because there are not enough science grads out there to do the actual work. That’s kinda depressing.

There were some misapprehensions, from non-scientists in the audience, about what fundamental scientists do. These participants seemed to feel that scientists should know what their discoveries will bring before they discover them. Seems weird to me, expecting an explorer to draw the map before they set out. Maybe that’s the communication breakdown between arts & science (CP Snow’s Two Cultures and all that), and why we are lacking science undergrads. People just don’t understand what science is or does at a really fundamental level, never mind the applied sciences and engineering.

The most pleasant folks that I met were the nuclear scientists, the least pleasant the environmentalist (singular), but please don’t extrapolate that to all nuclear scientists are nice guys and all environmentalist are ogres. Of the 4 or 5 people in the audience of ~200 that I had a decent chat to, two were nuclear, one environmental, one finance and one undecided.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.